欢迎来到360期刊网!
学术期刊
  • 学术期刊
  • 文献
  • 百科
电话

您当前的位置:   首页  >  SCI文献  >  Annals of surgery

Annals of surgery 荷兰主动脉直径较小的腹主动脉瘤手术治疗的变异。
影响因子:13.787 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003050
作者: Karthaus EG,Vahl A,van der Werf LR,Elsman BHP,Van Herwaarden JA,Wouters MWJM,Hamming JF 发表时间:2020-07-09 12:20:34
keywords: Karthaus EGVahl Avan der Werf LRElsman BHPVan Herwaarden JAWouters MWJMHamming JF
关键词:
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate reasons to deviate from aneurysm diameter thresholds, and focus on the difference in how Dutch vascular surgical units (VSUs) perceive their deviation and their actual deviation. BACKGROUND:Guidelines recommend surgical treatment for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with a diameter of at least 55 mm for men and 50 mm for women. We evaluate reasons to deviate from these guidelines, and focus on the difference in how Dutch vascular surgical units (VSUs) perceive their deviation and their actual deviation. METHODS:All patients undergoing elective AAA repair between 2013 and 2016 registered in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) were included. Surgery at diameters of <55 mm for men and <50 mm for women were considered guideline deviations. National deviation and hospital variation in deviation were evaluated over time. Questionnaires were distributed among all Dutch VSUs, inquiring for acceptable reasons for guideline deviation. VSUs were asked to estimate the guideline deviation percentage in their hospital which was then compared with their DSAA percentage. RESULTS:In all, 9039 patients were included. In 15%, we found guideline deviation, varying from 2% to 40% between VSUs. Over time, 21 VSUs were identified with a lower percentage of deviation than the national mean each year and 8 VSUs with a higher percentage. 44/60 VSUs completed the questionnaire. Most commonly reported reasons to deviate were concomitant large iliac diameter (91%) and saccular aneurysm (82%). The majority of the VSUs (77%) estimated their guideline deviation to be <5%. Eleven VSUs (25%) estimated their deviation concordant with their DSAA percentage, but 75% of VSUs underestimated their deviation. CONCLUSIONS:Dutch VSUs regularly deviate from the guidelines regarding aneurysm diameter, with variation between VSUs. Consensus exists amongst VSUs on acceptable reasons for guideline deviations; however, the majority underestimates their actual deviation percentage.
摘 要
目的: 评估偏离动脉瘤直径阈值的原因,并重点讨论荷兰血管外科单位 (VSUs) 如何感知其偏差及其实际偏差的差异。 背景: 指南推荐手术治疗无症状的腹主动脉瘤 (AAAs),男性直径至少 55mm,女性 50mm。我们评估偏离这些指南的原因,并关注荷兰血管外科单位 (VSUs) 如何感知其偏差及其实际偏差的差异。 方法: 纳入 2013 年至 2016 年间在荷兰外科动脉瘤审核 (DSAA) 登记的所有接受择期AAA修复的患者。男性直径 <55mm和女性直径 <50mm的手术被认为是指南偏差。随着时间的推移,评价了全国偏差和医院偏差的变化。在所有荷兰VSUs中分发问卷,询问指南偏差的可接受原因。VSUs被要求估计他们医院的指南偏差百分比,然后与他们的DSAA百分比进行比较。 结果: 共纳入 9039 例患者。在 15% 中,我们发现指南偏差,VSUs之间的偏差从 2% 到 40% 不等。随着时间的推移,发现 21 个VSUs的偏差百分比低于国家每年的平均值,8 个VSUs的偏差百分比高于国家平均值。44/60 VSUs完成了调查问卷。最常报告的偏离原因是合并大髂骨直径 (91%) 和囊状动脉瘤 (82%)。大多数VSUs (77%) 估计其指南偏差 <5%。11 个VSUs (25%) 估计其偏差与DSAA百分比一致,但 75% 的VSUs低估了其偏差。 结论: 荷兰VSUs经常偏离关于动脉瘤直径的指南,VSUs之间存在变异。VSUs对指南偏差的可接受原因存在共识; 然而,大多数人低估了他们的实际偏差百分比。
期刊介绍
《ANNALS OF SURGERY》 (点击进入期刊详情)
英文简介 : Annals of Surgery is the official publication of the American Surgical Association, European Surgical Association, Southern Surgical Association, New York Surgical Society and the Philadelphia Academy of Surgery.
中文简介 : (来自Google、百度翻译) 《外科年鉴》是美国外科学会、欧洲外科学会、南方外科学会、纽约外科学会和费城外科学会的官方出版物。
CIRCULATION RESEARCH 期刊中科院评价数据
新中科院分区
大类(学科) 小类(学科) 学科排名
医学

SURGERY (外科)

1/200
新发布的期刊年发文量
年度总发文量 年度论文发表量 年度综述发表量
299 288 11

总被引频次 :50355

特征因子 : 0.066690

影响因子趋势图

相关文献

360期刊网

专注医学期刊服务15年

  • 您好:请问您咨询什么等级的期刊?专注医学类期刊发表15年口碑企业,为您提供以下服务:

  • 1.医学核心期刊发表-全流程服务
    2.医学SCI期刊-全流程服务
    3.论文投稿服务-快速报价
    4.期刊推荐直至录用,不成功不收费

  • 客服正在输入...

x
立即咨询