发表一篇学和医学成像类SCI论文
需要多少钱?
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) can be performed with either a single-space technique or a double-space technique for cesarean section. We performed a double-blind randomized controlled study to compare the effect of the double-space technique with that of the single-space technique on sensory block level and side effects. METHODS:Parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under regional anesthesia were randomized to receive CSEA with either the double-space technique (double group, n = 20) or the single-space technique (single group, n = 20). In the double group, an epidural catheter was inserted at the L1-2 interspace, and dural puncture was performed at the L3-4 interspace. In the single group, the procedure was performed at the L3-4 interspace using the needle-through-needle technique. RESULTS:There were no differences in time to readiness or intraoperative level of sensory block between the two groups. The postoperative sensory level was maintained at a higher level in the double group than in the single group (1 h postoperatively, P = 0.029; 6 h postoperatively, P = 0.016). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of side effects. The parturient satisfaction scores 48 h postoperatively were significantly different between groups (9.5 in the double group vs. 8 in the single group, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS:We conclude that there were no differences in intraoperative variables between the double-space technique and the single-space technique for CSEA. However, double-space CSEA for cesarean section may be beneficial for controlling postoperative pain and improving parturient satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION:The study was retrospectively registered at https://cris.nih.go.kr under the trial ID KCT0002514. Date of registration: October 27, 2017.
展开更多
最新影响因子:2.376 | 期刊ISSN:1471-2253 | CiteScore:2.08 |
出版周期: | 是否OA:YES | 出版年份:0 |
自引率:3.10% | 研究方向:ANESTHESIOLOGY- |
出版地区:ENGLAND |
SCI期刊coverage:Science Citation Index Expanded(科学引文索引扩展)
专业编辑在线一对一答疑及时解决您的问题
BMC Anesthesiology is launching In Review, a new option that provides authors with on-demand information on the status of their manuscript, enables them to share their work with funders and their research community, and allows their colleagues to comment and collaborate - all whilst their manuscript is under review.
《BMC麻醉学》是在评论中推出的一种新的选择,它为作者提供有关他们手稿状况的按需提供的信息,使他们能够与资助者和他们的研究团体分享他们的工作,允许他们的同事发表评论和合作——所有这些都是在他们的手稿正在被审查的时候。
大类(学科) | 小类(学科) | 学科排名 |
医学 |
ANESTHESIOLOGY (麻醉学) 4区 |
23/31 |
年度总发文量 | 年度论文发表量 | 年度综述发表量 |
168 | 161 | 7 |
引文计数(2018)
文献(2015-2017)
913次引用
439篇文献
序号 | 类别 | 排名 | 百分位 |
1 |
大类(学科):Medicine
小类(学科):Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
|
#24/115
点击查看排名表
|
|
推荐刊物均可到国家新闻出
版总署网站查询正刊
可签署保密协议 ,不透露任
何用户信息可跟踪进程,全程
协议
1对1服务,7x24小时在线
15年经验沉淀,实体公司
运营
liting7111
liting7111
研究方向:危重病
liting7111
研究方向:认知 器官保护
审稿时间: 6个月内 接受率: 中等(50%命中)
liting7111
研究方向:器官保护基础研究
审稿时间: 2个月内 接受率: 一般容易(75%命中)
影响因子:5.315
ISSN:0148-396X
研究方向:医学-临床神经学
影响因子:1.725
ISSN:0028-3770
研究方向:医学-临床神经学
影响因子:2.21
ISSN:1878-8750
研究方向:CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
影响因子:4.332
ISSN:1092-0684
研究方向:CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
影响因子:2.816
ISSN:0001-6268
研究方向:医学-临床神经学
影响因子:2.8
ISSN:0344-5607
研究方向:医学-临床神经学
影响因子:0.972
ISSN:1019-5149
研究方向:医学-临床神经学
影响因子:1.532
ISSN:0256-7040
研究方向:医学-临床神经学
影响因子:1.165
ISSN:1016-2291
研究方向:医学-临床神经学
发表一篇学和医学成像类SCI论文
需要多少钱?
专注医学期刊服务15年
您好:请问您咨询什么等级的期刊?专注医学类期刊发表15年口碑企业,为您提供以下服务:
1.医学核心期刊发表-全流程服务
2.医学SCI期刊-全流程服务
3.论文投稿服务-快速报价
4.期刊推荐直至录用,不成功不收费
客服正在输入...
BMC Anesthesiology 投稿经验
(由下方点评分析获得,4人参与,15185人阅读)