发表一篇学和医学成像类SCI论文
需要多少钱?
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Functional independence and safe mobility, especially in older people, mostly rely on the ability to perform dual tasks, particularly during activities with variable- and fixed-priority attention. The aim of this study is to compare the dual-task training with progression from variable- to fixed-priority instructions versus dual-task training with variable-priority on gait speed in community-dwelling older adults. METHODS:This is an assessor- and participant-blinded, two-arm, randomized controlled trial with 60 community-dwelling male and female older adults between the ages of 60 and 80 years old. Participants will be randomly allocated into either the intervention group or the control group using a computer-generated permuted block randomization schedule. The intervention group will undertake a progressive dual-task training in which the participants will be progressively submitted to dual-task walking and postural balance exercises with variable- to fixed-priority instructions. The control group will be submitted to dual-task training with variable-priority attention exercises. Both groups will receive 48 sessions lasting for 60 min each over 24 weeks. The primary outcome will be the gait speed under single- and dual-task conditions. Secondary outcomes will include spatiotemporal gait parameters, functional balance, executive function, falls, quality of life, and depression symptoms. All the analyses will be based on the intention-to-treat principle. DISCUSSION:This is the first assessor- and participant-blinded, two-arm, randomized controlled trial with 6 months of intervention and an additional 6-month post-training follow up aiming to evaluate the effectiveness of training with progression from variable- to fixed-priority instructions on gait biomechanics, postural balance, falls episodes, executive functioning, and quality of life in community-dwelling older adults. If our hypotheses are confirmed, this training protocol can be implemented widely to improve gait speed and other functional activities and quality of life in community-dwelling older adults. This study protocol can be used to improve these functional aspects of community-dwelling older adults. This study may also contribute to future guidelines for the improvement of these clinical and biomechanical aspects in older people. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier - NCT03886805, Registered 22 March 2019.
展开更多
最新影响因子:4.07 | 期刊ISSN:1471-2318 | CiteScore:3.06 |
出版周期: | 是否OA:YES | 出版年份:0 |
自引率:7.60% | 研究方向:GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY- |
出版地区:ENGLAND |
SCI期刊coverage:Science Citation Index Expanded(科学引文索引扩展)
专业编辑在线一对一答疑及时解决您的问题
BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
《BMC老年医学》是一本开放访问的期刊,发表了关于老年人健康和保健各个方面的原始同行评审研究文章,包括医疗保健系统和政策的影响。该杂志还欢迎关注衰老过程的研究,包括细胞、遗传和生理过程以及认知改变。
大类(学科) | 小类(学科) | 学科排名 |
医学 |
GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY (老年医学) 2区 GERONTOLOGY (老年医学) |
7/36 |
年度总发文量 | 年度论文发表量 | 年度综述发表量 |
290 | 266 | 24 |
引文计数(2018)
文献(2015-2017)
1636次引用
535篇文献
序号 | 类别 | 排名 | 百分位 |
1 |
大类(学科):Medicine
小类(学科):Geriatrics and Gerontology
|
#13/94
点击查看排名表
|
|
推荐刊物均可到国家新闻出
版总署网站查询正刊
可签署保密协议 ,不透露任
何用户信息可跟踪进程,全程
协议
1对1服务,7x24小时在线
15年经验沉淀,实体公司
运营
liting7111
研究方向:老年医学
审稿时间: 3个月内 接受率: 中等(50%命中)
影响因子:1.714
ISSN:1386-2073
研究方向:化学-生化研究方法
影响因子:6.088
ISSN:1933-7213
研究方向:医学-神经科学
影响因子:1.379
ISSN:0362-5664
研究方向:医学-临床神经学
影响因子:4.287
ISSN:1473-7175
研究方向:CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
影响因子:1.821
ISSN:1528-4336
研究方向:医学-传染病学
影响因子:2.385
ISSN:1120-009X
研究方向:医学-药学
影响因子:2.706
ISSN:1076-6294
研究方向:医学-传染病学
影响因子:4.177
ISSN:1178-6973
研究方向:-
影响因子:5.758
ISSN:0305-7453
研究方向:医学-传染病学
发表一篇学和医学成像类SCI论文
需要多少钱?
专注医学期刊服务15年
您好:请问您咨询什么等级的期刊?专注医学类期刊发表15年口碑企业,为您提供以下服务:
1.医学核心期刊发表-全流程服务
2.医学SCI期刊-全流程服务
3.论文投稿服务-快速报价
4.期刊推荐直至录用,不成功不收费
客服正在输入...
BMC Geriatrics 投稿经验
(由下方点评分析获得,1人参与,21846人阅读)